David Chase on ‘The Sopranos,’ Trump and, Yes, That Ending | Modern Society of USA

David Chase on ‘The Sopranos,’ Trump and, Yes, That Ending

David Chase on ‘The Sopranos,’ Trump and, Yes, That Ending

“‘Remember when’ is the lowest form of conversation,” Tony Soprano once told his mob cohorts in “The Sopranos.”

If David Chase, Tony’s creator, doesn’t totally agree with that assessment — “It was a friend of mine in high school who said that,” he said — that doesn’t mean he’s particularly fond of nostalgic reminiscence.

“It’s a cheap thing. It drives me crazy,” he said last week. “I thought revisiting the show would be more pleasurable, but it turns out I’ve forgotten a lot more than I thought I would.”

Alas, it’s unavoidable this month. Thursday is the 20th anniversary of the premiere of “The Sopranos” on HBO, a moment that, as much as anything, signaled the beginning of TV’s still-flourishing era of ambitious storytelling and artistic credibility.

An immediate sensation — in 1999 The Times said “it just may be the greatest work of American popular culture of the last quarter century” — “The Sopranos” demonstrated that viewers would embrace unconventional TV shows, setting the table for what has become known as “prestige TV.”

There had been complex, challenging series before it, like “Twin Peaks,” “The X-Files” and “NYPD Blue.” But over six seasons on HBO, Chase’s offbeat story of the depressed, violent but oddly sympathetic mob boss Tony Soprano, played by James Gandolfini (who died in 2013), dramatically expanded the parameters of series television, enlacing its sometimes shockingly brutal mob tale with slapstick comedy, surrealist dream logic and narrative invention.

Phrases like “the Russian in the woods” and “the cut to black” became a kind of pop-cultural shorthand for an uncompromising, auteurist approach to TV making that has informed not just other antihero stories like “Breaking Bad” or “The Shield,” but also a diverse array of singular series like “Mad Men,” “Transparent” and “Atlanta.”

“I didn’t think that ‘The Sopranos’ would chart any kind of new course,” Chase said. “All I wanted to do is just get as close to cinema as I could.”

In the time since “The Sopranos” cut to black in 2007, Chase made the period rock ’n’ roll film “Not Fade Away” and wrote other shows and films that have yet to see the light of day. After years of resisting mob-show pitches, he is now working on a “Sopranos” prequel feature film called “The Many Saints of Newark,” which will be set in the title city in the 1960s and involve the father of Christopher Moltisanti (the “Sopranos” character played by Michael Imperioli). It will likely come out in 2020, Chase said.

Sitting in his Upper East Side apartment a few feet from his writing desk, Chase was terse but thoughtful and accommodating as he looked back on “The Sopranos,” his gruff demeanor spiked with dry wit. In edited excerpts from that and an earlier conversation for an upcoming video project for The New York Times, he discussed the legacy of “The Sopranos,” how A.J. (Robert Iler) might fit within the Trump White House and, yes, the endlessly dissected finale.

Why did you want to do a mob show, specifically?

I was Italian-American, and I wanted to see Italian-Americans portrayed. Now these people would say, “You didn’t portray Italians as they are. All Italians are not gangsters.” That was true for the show, too. Dr. Melfi [Lorraine Bracco] wasn’t a gangster. Other people they ran into were not gangsters. But the main characters were.

How did James Gandolfini shape Tony in ways that you perhaps did not anticipate?

The first day we were shooting, there was a scene in which Christopher told Tony that he was going to write a movie script and go to Hollywood. And in the dialogue, Tony said, “What are you, crazy?” and he gives him a love tap. That’s what I pictured.

And we came to do it, and Jim pulled him out of his chair, shook him by the collar and was like “Are you [expletive] crazy?” And I thought: That’s Tony Soprano. He just felt like a real gangster.

You worked in traditional broadcast television for decades, on shows like “The Rockford Files” and “Northern Exposure.” What specific TV conventions were you trying to break out of with “The Sopranos”?

Really all of them. I hated commercials and the way they interrupted everything. I wanted to slow the pace of the episode down or speed it up, as we wanted to. Language. I wanted to create characters that felt like real people and behave the way people behave, which I didn’t see on network television.

How did you go about it?

I always had this saying: The first 10 ideas you get, throw them away. And that’s what we used to do, is to just keep going until it was something you hadn’t seen before or couldn’t anticipate.

The show became famous both for surprising resolutions — like when Janice Soprano [Aida Turturro] killed Richie Aprile [David Proval] in Season 2 — and things left unresolved, like the infamous Russian in the woods in the “Pine Barrens” episode. What did those kinds of swerves bring to the story?

My wife’s grandfather was from France and he fought in World War I — he was gassed in the war. He had two sons, and when the war was over he came to the United States because he didn’t want them to be around war, and he didn’t want them to go into the army. And then they both went into the Army here in the United States.

I thought about that all the time and I think that’s what life is like. You prepare and prepare for things. “I am going to take charge of something. I’m going to avoid all that.” And it comes from some other side — you never see it. That’s a lifelike thing, and that’s what we were trying to do.

Was there an early moment or episode when you had a breakthrough?

I think “College” broke through something for me, the fifth episode of the first season. When Tony took his daughter on a college tour [and brutally killed a former mobster turned snitch along the way]. Some of the best episodes were ones where he was out of his element, or someone was out of their element. “Pine Barrens.” They were like little movies, which is what I was always trying to do: A little movie every week. I wasn’t fond of the idea of doing continuing stories.

Why not?

I don’t know. I thought about “Dallas” — I didn’t want to do that. But I let myself be convinced to do them and it turned out to be a really good idea.

Were there any episodes you wish you could do over?

The show when they went to Italy. That really wasn’t our element. We really didn’t know what we were talking about, so I didn’t like it as much.

Edie Falco jokes about wanting to bring the show back, with Carmela as the boss of the family. Has anyone ever seriously tried to get you to resurrect it in some form?

No. People approached me about doing more mob stuff, but not “The Sopranos.”

Really? I would have guessed Netflix would have backed up the Brink’s truck and said, “How much will it take?”

Nope. Never happened.

What would it take?

To bring it back? I wouldn’t do it. At the end, we were done. I was done.

What “Sopranos” influences do you see when you watch television?

The use of a deeply flawed hero and his problems. And when news shows talk about Trump, for example, they’ll say it’s like “The Sopranos.” People, including your own paper, use “The Sopranos” as an example of crookedness and culpability.

I don’t watch a lot of series television. Unfortunately what I do is spend my time watching CNN, Fox and MSNBC. So I get good and depressed, and angry.

I’d forgotten, until I rewatched it recently, that in the finale A.J. talks about wanting to work as a helicopter pilot for Trump. Had that worked out, he might be part of the administration now.

He might be the new chief of staff. He’d be buddy-buddy with Stephen Miller, I know that.

What do you think Tony would have made of Trump becoming president?

He would think the guy was full of [expletive]. Whether he thought he was a good president or not — I don’t know that Tony thought much about that question at all, with anybody who was in office. But I know Tony would have thought Trump was penny-ante, in terms of his lying and presentation.

Of course, the finale is best remembered for the cut to black and all the commentary that followed. Would you have done anything differently had you known you’d get asked about it for years?

I don’t think so. You couldn’t help but be surprised — beyond surprised — at the response. It was a pleasurable sensation that people were talking about it, that it made an impression on people. It made a lot of people angry. Sometimes I couldn’t believe it was that important to people.

With the 20th anniversary coming, are you ready for another round of “Is Tony dead or not?”

I’ve got to say I’m just bored with it. I also feel like, Jesus, there were 86 episodes and you’re fixated on that? Can’t we talk about something else?

Source link